Registration of 3D marks in light of the Gömböc judgement
Words and logos are not the only signs that can be registered as trademarks but one can also apply for registration of a product shape as a trademark. There are, however, certain restraints on the registrability of such signs. A shape that is necessary to obtain a technical result or a shape that gives substantial value to the product cannot be registered in the EU. The CJEU tried to clarify what this means in the Gömböc judgement that has recently been released.
A Hungarian company wanted to register a national three-dimensional mark consisting of the shape of decorative products they produced (see the picture). What is special about these products is that they are always in equilibrium due to their convex homogeneous body with one stable and one unstable point which is the result of certain mathematical laws. The referring court asked whether the necessity of the shape to obtain a technical result is determined on the basis of the graphic representation alone or may the perception of the relevant public also be taken into account. The CJEU ruled that other useful information can also be taken into account but they need to be objective and reliable (such as the product descriptions, data regarding previous IP rights, surveys and expert opinions, etc.). Since the assessment of the relevant public is necessarily subjective to a certain extent, potentially giving rise to uncertainty, such information cannot be taken into account in determining the technical function of the product.
The CJEU also dealt with the absolute ground for refusal of a shape which gives substantial value to the product. The national court asked whether this absolute ground is applicable when it can only be established on the basis of the perception or knowledge of the buyer. The Court answered that this can be taken into consideration, but only when it is apparent from objective and reliable evidence that the consumer’s decision to purchase the product is to a large extent determined by an essential characteristic of that shape. Finally, the CJEU also decided on the question whether the shape of the product protected by design right is automatically excluded from trademark protection. The Court clarified that the fact that the appearance of a product is protected as a design does not prevent a sign consisting of the shape of that product from benefiting from protection under trademark law, provided that the conditions for registration of that sign as a trademark are satisfied. The CJEU thus issued another important decision in which it confirmed the possibility of IP rights cumulation and coexistence.
See the discussion on this and some other trademark cases issued by the CJEU in the past year here.
On Monday, 14 September 2020 the Public consultation on digital access to European cultural heritage was closed. The purpose of the public consultation was that the European Commission receives feedback on its Recommendation of 27 October 2011 on the digitisation and online accessibility of cultural material and digital preservation from the interested stakeholders. Among others, Communia submitted its response as well, outlining the need for adaptation to the ever changing digital world.
Last week the deadline for responses to the European Commission’s Targeted consultation addressed to the participants to the stakeholder dialogue on Article 17 of the CDSM Directive came to a close. Yesterday 14 September 2020, civil society organisations sent to Commissioner Breton a joint letter summarising their responses to the Commission’s consultation document and emphasising the importance of user rights protection.
On Wednesday, 9 September 2020, the General Court published its long-awaited judgement in the “Teran” case (Case T-626/17), which started already back in 2017, and dismissed Slovenia’s action for annulment of the Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/1353 of 19 May 2017 amending Regulation (EC) No 607/2009 as regards the wine grape varieties and their synonyms that may appear on wine labels, pursuant to which the designation ‘Teran’ may be used on the labels of Croatian wines, produced in Istra region.
After three successfully organised virtual “salons”, Communia will, in cooperation with #NoWorries project, organise the fourth one “Which digital policies work for cultural heritage in 2020s?” on Thursday, 17 September 2020. You are welcome to attend!