Registration of 3D marks in light of the Gömböc judgement
Words and logos are not the only signs that can be registered as trademarks but one can also apply for registration of a product shape as a trademark. There are, however, certain restraints on the registrability of such signs. A shape that is necessary to obtain a technical result or a shape that gives substantial value to the product cannot be registered in the EU. The CJEU tried to clarify what this means in the Gömböc judgement that has recently been released.
A Hungarian company wanted to register a national three-dimensional mark consisting of the shape of decorative products they produced (see the picture). What is special about these products is that they are always in equilibrium due to their convex homogeneous body with one stable and one unstable point which is the result of certain mathematical laws. The referring court asked whether the necessity of the shape to obtain a technical result is determined on the basis of the graphic representation alone or may the perception of the relevant public also be taken into account. The CJEU ruled that other useful information can also be taken into account but they need to be objective and reliable (such as the product descriptions, data regarding previous IP rights, surveys and expert opinions, etc.). Since the assessment of the relevant public is necessarily subjective to a certain extent, potentially giving rise to uncertainty, such information cannot be taken into account in determining the technical function of the product.
The CJEU also dealt with the absolute ground for refusal of a shape which gives substantial value to the product. The national court asked whether this absolute ground is applicable when it can only be established on the basis of the perception or knowledge of the buyer. The Court answered that this can be taken into consideration, but only when it is apparent from objective and reliable evidence that the consumer’s decision to purchase the product is to a large extent determined by an essential characteristic of that shape. Finally, the CJEU also decided on the question whether the shape of the product protected by design right is automatically excluded from trademark protection. The Court clarified that the fact that the appearance of a product is protected as a design does not prevent a sign consisting of the shape of that product from benefiting from protection under trademark law, provided that the conditions for registration of that sign as a trademark are satisfied. The CJEU thus issued another important decision in which it confirmed the possibility of IP rights cumulation and coexistence.
See the discussion on this and some other trademark cases issued by the CJEU in the past year here.
On 23rd of November, 2021, the European Commission has published two reports in the field of copyright, as required by Directives 2014/26/EU (CRM Directive) and 2019/790 (DSM Directive). They are supported by two studies: Study on emerging issues on collective licensing management in the digital environment, and Study on selected issues relating to the application of the CRM Directive.
A new book “Law and Artificial Intelligence: Issues of Ethics, Human Rights and Social Harm” was published (Institute of Criminology at the Faculty of law in Ljubljana, 2021), the editors of which are prof. dr. Aleš Završnik and dr. Katja Simončič. The author of one of the articles is also dr. Maja Bogataj Jančič, LL.M., LL.M., who wrote an article on the topic of whether artificial intelligence can be an author of a copyright work.
Jožef Štefan Institute is organising GO-DIP workshop series, first of them coming on November 19th, 2021 is revolving around software IP and data agreements. The GO-DIP project aims to increase the competencies of knowledge generators and intermediaries. At 15.10 dr. Maja Bogataj Jančič, LL.M., LL.M. will be lecturing in the Workshop: Development of a checklist for model digital IP agreements. Welcome!
2nd GPAI Summit will occur from 11-12 November, 2021 in Paris, France. Leading international AI experts from civil society, academia, industry and governments, including ministerial-level delegates from GPAI’s Membership, will come together for GPAI’s annual event. This public-facing event will include reporting on the ten Working Groups’ study topics, including the reporting of Data Governance Working Group (DG WG). Public conferences will be broadcasted live on GPAI’s Youtube channel. Welcome!