Phonogram producers can prevent sampling
The German Federal Court of Justice (BGH) recently brought an end to a more than 20-year long saga in the “Metall auf Metall IV” case. In its decision (available here, in German), the BGH decided that reproduction of two-second sound samples infringes the related right of reproduction of phonogram producers.
The dispute began in 1997 when the company Pelham used two-second sound samples from Kraftwerk’s “Metall auf Metall” soundtrack to produce the “Nur mir” song. Kraftwerk, as the producer of the phonogram, on which “Metall auf Metall” was originally recorded, filed suit, claiming that Pelham infringed its related right to reproduction. The case made its way all up to the BGH, which sought clarification from the CJEU in regards to the interpretation of the so-called InfoSoc Directive, particularly its Article 2(c) which addresses the phonogram producers’ reproduction right. In its “Pelham” decision, which has already been reported at IPI, the CJEU clarified that the use of sound samples, albeit very short ones, infringes the phonogram producers’ right of reproduction, except when the samples are used in a modified form and are unrecognisable to the ear.
In light of the “Pelham” decision, the BGH weighed whether the “Metall auf Metall” samples are recognisable to the ear of an average music listener, and whether their use could be allowed under exceptions contained in the German Copyright Act Urheberrechtsgesetz (UrhG) that implement Article 5 of the InfoSoc Directive, particularly the quotation exception (Section 51 UrhG), incidental inclusion (Section 57 UrhG), or parody and pastiche. The BGH ultimately decided that the samples used were recognisable to the average music listener’s ear and that no exceptions were applicable, and therefore Pelham infringed Kraftwerk’s related right of phonogram producers.
The BGH’s decision is hardly unexpected (all the more so considering the CJEU’s last year “Pelham” judgement) and it opens the door for an expansive interpretation of related rights and therefore their protection. In doing so, it warns future music creators that, before resorting to samples, they should be wary not only of others’ copyright but of phonogram producers’ related rights as well.
After UNESCO General Conference confirmed in 2019 the establishmentof the International Research Center for Artificial Intelligence (IRCAI), the Government of Republic of Slovenia finally this week adopted an official notification for its establishment. This means that IRCAI is now officially established.
On 5 and 6 October 2020, Europeana in cooperation with Deutsche Nationalbibliothek and under the auspices of the German Presidency of the Council of Europe organised a digital conference titled “The role of copyright in the digital transformation of the cultural heritage sector”. The conference, while organised as an invite-only event, also included a publicly open session “Past, present and future of copyright & digital transformation. Opportunities in the copyright in the Digital Single Market Directive”. Timotej Kotnik Jesih attended the session on behalf of IPI.
As a response to the European Commission’s Targeted consultation document addressed to the participants of the stakeholder dialogue on implementation of Article 17 of the Directive 2019/790 on copyright and related rights in the Digital Single Market, the French Government published their observations last week. Therein, based on flawed understanding of the DSM Directive Article 17, of the Commission’s consultation document, and of the general copyright law principles, they oppose the guidance for implementation, proposed by the Commission.